NYC.gov always open Office of the Mayor Government Visitors Business Residents Contact Us Email Updates Search
OATH banner



OATH HomeOur JudgesBenchNotesContact UsRules of PracticeForfeitureHearing RulesInformation for LawyersFree Legal AssistanceImportant DisclaimerRecent DecisionsOATH FormsMediation Center

Party in front of court Bench
 

En Espanol

Subchapter D - Additional Rules for Post-Seizure Review of Impoundment of Vehicles

§ 2-41 Applicability.
This subchapter shall apply solely to cases brought to determine the validity of post-seizure retention of vehicles by the Police Department or other agency as evidence or for prospective or pending actions to forfeit such vehicles. Chapter 1 of this title shall also apply to such cases except to the extent that it is inconsistent with this subchapter. Cases concerning retention of vehicles seized as evidence or for prospective or pending actions to forfeit such vehicles pursuant to § 14-140 of the New York City Administrative Code shall also be governed by Krimstock v. Kelly, 99 Civ. 12041 (MBM), amended order and judgment (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2004), and any amendments, modifications and revisions thereof.

§ 2-42 Parties.
For purposes of this subchapter, the agency seeking to retain the vehicle shall be the petitioner, and the claimant to the vehicle shall be the respondent, as defined in § 1-01 of this title.

§ 2-43 Pleadings.
(a) The time provided in § 1-26(d) for service of the notice of hearing shall not apply.

(b) Notwithstanding § 1-24 of this title, the respondent may serve and file an answer at any time until the commencement of the hearing.

§ 2-44 Trial Continuances.
A motion by the petitioner, after the conclusion of the respondent's evidence, for a continuance of trial to present rebuttal evidence in the form of testimony from witnesses not called on the petitioner's case-in-chief, shall be granted for good cause shown.

§ 2-45 Default by Vehicle Owner.
Pursuant to § 1-45 of this title, where an owner of a vehicle fails to appear for trial, having been properly served with required notices, the petitioner need not prove that such owner "permitted or suffered" the allegedly illegal use of the seized vehicle.

§ 2-46 Transcription of Hearings.
Notwithstanding § 1-51 of this title, the recording of the hearing or of other proceedings in the case, whether electronic or stenographic, shall not be transcribed except (i) upon request and payment of reasonable transcription costs, (ii) upon direction of the administrative law judge, in his or her discretion, or (iii) as otherwise required by law.

 

 


 






 
 
  Copyright 2008 The City of New York Contact Us | FAQs | Privacy Statement | Site Map