We will work pursue a
variety of strategies to improve and expand bus service
New York City has the highest bus ridership in the United
States, but the slowest buses. As the city grows and
vehicles compete for the same road, more riders board
buses, causing buses to operate at even slower speeds.
Between 2002 and 2006 alone, bus speeds across the city
slowed by 4%. (See chart above: Bus Speeds)
Because traffic routinely delays buses, travelers are
often stranded at bus stops with no way to gauge whether
to keep waiting or move on. Even on the best days, every
rider has experienced the feeling of watching a bus
pull away seconds before reaching the stop, knowing
that the posted schedule may not be any guide to when
the next one will arrive.
Yet buses retain enormous appeal. They offer flexibility
that subways cannot match; the capital costs to start
a bus service are small compared with rail transit;
and they can be up and running in months, not years.
With new technology already in use by the MTA, they
are environmentally friendly. Many senior citizens,
and others, prefer the bus to the subway to avoid climbing
stairs. And buses are the most efficient use of our
limited road space: one bus takes the same amount of
road space as two cars, but can carry 70 people.
The key is to improve speeds and reliability. Cities
around the world have begun embracing the benefits of
bus travel while addressing the issues that have traditionally
undercut buses' effectiveness. Dedicating bus lanes,
and enforcing their exclusive use, is an important step.
Another strategy is Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), an overall
approach that has been implemented in cities around
the world. BRT uses dedicated bus lanes, fewer stops,
time-saving technologies, and additional efficiency
measures to make bus travel fast, reliable, and effective.
(See case study on facing page: Bus Rapid Transit Around
the World)
We will initiate and expand Bus Rapid Transit
Within two years, New York City and the MTA will launch
five BRT routes, one in each borough. We will incorporate
many of the most successful proven features from domestic
and international systems, including establishing dedicated
bus lanes with bright, distinctive signage. The lanes
will be marked with red paint to distinguish them from
regular traffic lanes, and their exclusive use by buses
will be enforced rigorously. To strengthen our enforcement
ability, we will seek the approval of the State Legislature
to use cameras to issue fines to drivers who violate
these lanes. (See photo: New York City Bus Rapid Transit
Stop)
BRT service will run along the same routes as traditional
buses; but, more buses will run along the routes, and
stops will be spaced farther apart than local service,
with stations every 10 to 15 blocks. (By contrast, regular
buses often stop every two to three blocks.) Electronic
message boards will provide riders with real-time updates
on arrival times. As illustrated below, the savings
in terms of travel times will be significant.
By 2014, we will expand BRT service by at least five
additional routes. We will also implement new technologies,
including giving BRT vehicles signal priority-which
means traffic lights recognize approaching buses and
either turn or stay green so that the buses remain on
schedule. We are already working with the MTA to test
this technology on Victory Boulevard on Staten Island.
Where possible, we will build sidewalk extensions that
allow buses to stop without pulling over to the curb-and
provide more waiting room for riders who might otherwise
impede passing pedestrians. (These are being installed
in Lower Manhattan this year.) We are also investigating
ways to allow passengers to board and exit buses more
quickly. Potential ideas include electronic smart cards
and letting passengers pay their fares before boarding
buses. If successful, all of these technologies could
be implemented system-wide, not only on BRT routes.
(See commuter profile on following page: Staten Island
to Brooklyn)
Progress (as of 4/22/08):
Significant improvements have been made in the past
year to each of the five chosen BRT corridor plans (with
the exception of Merrick Boulevard, which was reframed
into a set of bus priority improvements in Downtown
Jamaica). In addition, 34th Street in Manhattan was
added as a new BRT corridor, and a series of bus priority
improvements are now planned for Fifth Avenue and Madison
Avenue in Manhattan. The first BRT corridor, on Fordham
Road in the Bronx, is set to begin service in June 2008.
The remaining four BRT services will be introduced between
late 2008 and 2011. This program was previously funded
through the Urban Partnership Agreement (UPA) between
the City and the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Since these funds were contingent on approval of congestion
pricing by the State Legislature before April 7 2007,
DOT and the MTA are now pursuing federal New Starts
funding to implement these corridors.
We will dedicate Bus/High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
lanes on the East River bridges
As neighborhoods in Brooklyn and Queens grow, congestion
on some subway lines across the East River worsens.
Crowding is felt most acutely at the stations nearest
Manhattan, where rush hour riders are increasingly forced
to let packed trains go by before finding one they can
squeeze into. That's why bus service across the river
would be an attractive alternative for many of these
riders.
We will create new or improved bus lanes on the Manhattan,
Williamsburg, and Queensboro Bridges to allow the MTA
to expand local service to and from Manhattan. These
lanes could also serve express buses and carpoolers.
We will work with the MTA to identify the bus routes
that will benefit most from these lanes, and particularly
alleviate crowding on the E train, L train, and 7 train.
Progress (as of 4/22/08):
The New York City Department of Transportation (DOT)
implemented a bus/HOV lane on the Manhattan Bridge in
August 2007. In June 2008, DOT will begin a study to
improve bus access across the Queensboro Bridge, which
will include investigating bus lanes on the bridge and
on approach roads.
We will explore other improvements to bus service
Further opportunities to improve bus service across
the system exist. Many of the technologies that will
be used for BRT-traffic light priority, electronic message
boards, bus bulbs-could be used by regular buses as
well. Opportunities besides the East River Bridges may
exist where dedicated bus lanes could significantly
improve service. Adjustments to service patterns-skip-stop
Express Bus service, for example, or stopping some Express
Buses in Downtown Brooklyn-might also increase ridership
and help to reduce congestion. Changes in traffic patterns,
signal timing or street alignment might eliminate "hot
spots" where buses routinely get delayed. Because
they rely on City-owned streets, good bus service requires
close cooperation between the City and the MTA. The
City will invite the MTA to work with it to identify
a wide range of opportunities, big and small, where
joint efforts might provide better transit service.
(See map on previous page: Express Bus Service Today
Progress (as of 4/22/08):
DOT and the MTA are working together to implement Transit
Signal Priority (TSP) in at least 223 locations, allowing
buses to move faster by having to stop at fewer red
signals. This program was previously funded by the UPA,
so DOT is now pursuing federal CMAQ funding to continue
the project. DOT has also initiated the Bus Hot Spots
program, applying focused BRT-type solutions to move
buses more quickly through congested intersections or
bottleneck areas. By the end of 2008, DOT will undertake
a hot spot study of Jamaica, the City's busiest bus
center, and expand bus priority treatments on 5th and
Madison Avenues and 34th Street in Manhattan, which
carry very high volumes of both local and express buses.
|